<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Kommentarer til: Retten til at håne	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://punditokraterne.dk/2006/02/20/retten-til-at-hane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://punditokraterne.dk/2006/02/20/retten-til-at-hane/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:08:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Af: Poul Højlund		</title>
		<link>https://punditokraterne.dk/2006/02/20/retten-til-at-hane/#comment-1377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poul Højlund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frihed.info/?p=3081#comment-1377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Her er en helt frisk kommentar fra USA:Stand up for Denmark!Why are we not defending our ally?By Christopher HitchensPosted Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2006, at 12:29 PM ET &quot;Put the case that we knew of a highly paranoid religious cult organization with a secretive leader. Now put the case that this cult, if criticized in the press, would take immediate revenge by kidnapping a child. Put the case that, if the secretive leader were also to be lampooned, two further children would be killed at random. Would the press be guilty of &quot;self-censorship&quot; if it declined to publish anything that would inflame the said cult? Well, yes it would be guilty, but very few people would insist on the full exertion of the First Amendment right. However, the consequences for the cult and its leader would be severe as well. All civilized people would regard it as hateful and dangerous, and steps would be taken to circumscribe its influence, and to ensure that no precedent was set.The incredible thing about the ongoing Kristallnacht against Denmark (and in some places, against the embassies and citizens of any Scandinavian or even European Union nation) is that it has resulted in, not opprobrium for the religion that perpetrates and excuses it, but increased respectability!&quot;Fortsæt på &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2136714/fr/rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2136714/fr/rss&lt;/a&gt;/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her er en helt frisk kommentar fra USA:Stand up for Denmark!Why are we not defending our ally?By Christopher HitchensPosted Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2006, at 12:29 PM ET &#8220;Put the case that we knew of a highly paranoid religious cult organization with a secretive leader. Now put the case that this cult, if criticized in the press, would take immediate revenge by kidnapping a child. Put the case that, if the secretive leader were also to be lampooned, two further children would be killed at random. Would the press be guilty of &#8220;self-censorship&#8221; if it declined to publish anything that would inflame the said cult? Well, yes it would be guilty, but very few people would insist on the full exertion of the First Amendment right. However, the consequences for the cult and its leader would be severe as well. All civilized people would regard it as hateful and dangerous, and steps would be taken to circumscribe its influence, and to ensure that no precedent was set.The incredible thing about the ongoing Kristallnacht against Denmark (and in some places, against the embassies and citizens of any Scandinavian or even European Union nation) is that it has resulted in, not opprobrium for the religion that perpetrates and excuses it, but increased respectability!&#8221;Fortsæt på <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2136714/fr/rss" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2136714/fr/rss</a>/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Af: Poul Højlund		</title>
		<link>https://punditokraterne.dk/2006/02/20/retten-til-at-hane/#comment-1378</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poul Højlund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frihed.info/?p=3081#comment-1378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Masser af amerikanske kommentatorer støtter de danske tegnere, check Mark Steyn, Diana West, Michelle Malkin og med dem mange andre. Debatten er levende dér og langt mere principiel end her. Googl dem og følg deres links.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Masser af amerikanske kommentatorer støtter de danske tegnere, check Mark Steyn, Diana West, Michelle Malkin og med dem mange andre. Debatten er levende dér og langt mere principiel end her. Googl dem og følg deres links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Object Caching 23/39 objects using Disk
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: punditokraterne.dk @ 2026-09-07 14:28:08 by W3 Total Cache
-->