Jeg forstår ikke umiddelbart dine bevæggrunde til absolut at ville skrive kommentarer under et kinesisk æskesystem af obskure pseudonymer. Men hvis det er et ubehjælpsomt forsøg på at narre læserne til at tro, at der er mere end én person i kongeriget, der interesserer sig for dine små bizarre sofatanker, lommenumerologi og sammensværgelsesteorier, skulle du måske i det mindste overveje enten ikke at skrive tonsvis af næsten enslydende off-topic indlæg på forskellige fora samtidigt – og i hvert fald skifte hyperlinket i dine forskellige bizarre aliaser ud i to på hinanden følgende indlæg. Det er ligesom en kende for gennemskueligt, når både et tryk på “Peder Bisgaard” og “Claude Greengrass” fører til den samme blog…………

It took me some time, I admit. I’ve found out why the scholars on this board will not consent to, that it is the peg of the Danish Krone towards the euro, that is the main problem in current Danish economic policies.

You see, they have locked themselves in a position where they — urged by CEPOS and other neo-liberal establishments — constantly are being urged to lash our against the high taxes and tariffs in this country. they don’t care if the Welfarestate is crushed in the process, they just go blindly after the high taxes.

But this is very narrow minds that would come up with something like this. Instead they should focus on the most optimal way that Denmark can finance its Welfarestate. And since the design of it is mostly Swedish in its origin, it implies that we follow the Swedish way of financing it as well. And this means a flexible currency, which not only acts as a shoch absorber during financial crisis, but on a daily basis helps companies compete,- in a way that no comparable “Industrial policy” (Which they in principle are against, and good for that) could bring about.

Summa summarum: It is simply good neo-liberal policies to give companies a helping hand in this way – and then nothing more; the companies will see to it themselves. They will then do what they do best, but optimal conditions for them to operate under, should be set by the State. That’s what we conservatives believe anyway, and I think those neo-liberals can come round to supporting this. As I said, the alternative is rising taxes.